The Tate Britain artwork gallery is to fee an artist to create a brand new work to sit down alongside a Twenties mural that it says incorporates “racist imagery”.
Rex Whistler’s wall portray contains depictions of black slaves on a leash and caricatures of Chinese language figures.
The room will now not be used as a restaurant, because it had been for many years.
As an alternative, Tate stated the brand new set up would “be exhibited alongside and in dialogue with the mural, reframing the best way the house is skilled”.
The London gallery has not but chosen which modern artist will create the brand new work.
“It should even be joined by a brand new show of interpretative materials, which can critically interact with the mural’s historical past and content material, together with its racist imagery,” Tate stated.
“It should discover the artist’s life and profession, responses to the work over time, and connections to wider historic contexts.”
In 2020, the members of the Tate’s ethics committee stated they “have been unequivocal of their view that the imagery of the work is offensive”.
They stated the work, titled The Expedition in Pursuit of Uncommon Meats, “shouldn’t be altered or eliminated”, however famous the “uncomfortable juxtaposition of the mural and an consuming house”.
In Wednesday’s announcement, Tate Britain Alex Farquharson director stated: “The Rex Whistler mural presents a singular problem. It has remained static on the partitions of a restaurant for nearly a century whereas the museum round it has continuously shifted.
“Tate Britain is now a spot of ever-changing shows and commissions, the place the previous and current are juxtaposed, and the place artwork is open to all.
“The mural is a part of our institutional and cultural historical past and we should take accountability for it, however this new method will even allow us to mirror the values and commitments we maintain in the present day and to deliver new voices and concepts to the fore.”
Artwork critic Waldemar Januszczak stated on Twitter that it was “about time” the gallery took motion, however that it was “a muddled, time-wasting response”.
He wrote: “Discuss, speak, speak as traditional. Simply cowl up the rattling issues. Or let me free in there with a chisel!”
In an announcement, Zarina Muhammad and Gabrielle de la Puente of artwork criticism group The White Pube instructed the BBC: “The mural doesn’t must be stored to be remembered; the mural actually doesn’t must be constantly restored with tens of millions of kilos price of funding to ensure that us to debate the issues inside its imagery.
“We will nonetheless speak concerning the horrible issues it stands for even after it’s destroyed, and destruction is not an finish level. So it ought to go. Tate ought to cease defending it.”